Drawing for AIRFREECONCEPT

USPTO serial 79150418

AIRFREECONCEPT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRFREECONCEPT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Non-pneumatic tires for automobiles; non-pneumatic tires for electric carts for freight handling; non-pneumatic tires for electric carts for luggage carriage; non-pneumatic tires for wheelchairs; non-pneumatic tires for all-terrain vehicles; non-pneumatic tires for small electric cars; non-pneumatic tires for mobility scooters; non-pneumatic tires for electric wheelchairs; non-pneumatic tires for three-wheeled or four-wheeled electric cars; non-pneumatic tires for golf carts; tires for automobiles; wheels and rims for automobilesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 1, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 14, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 12, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 31, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 13, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 13, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 12, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 29, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 16, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 14, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 14, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 14, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 8, 2014LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Aug 7, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance