USPTO serial 79150454
PICKLES THE FROG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICKLES THE FROG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
John Alumit ALUMIT IP135 S. Jackson Street, Suite 200Glendale, CA 91205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Woven fabrics; knitted fabrics; felt and non-woven textile fabrics; oilcloth; gummed waterproof cloth; vinyl coated cloth; rubberized cloth; towels; handkerchiefs; woven textile goods for personal use, namely, bath towels of textile, hand towels of textile and place mats of textile material; bath linen; sanitary flannel; towels of textile; handkerchiefs of textile; face towels of textile; gift wrap of textile; gift wrap of fabric; mosquito nets; bedsheets; futon quilts and quilts; futon quilt cases made of linen; quilt cases made of linen; futon ticks, namely, unstuffed futon covers not of paper; pillowcases; blankets; table napkins of textile; dish towels for drying; shower curtains; cloth banners and cloth flags; fitted toilet seat covers of textile; unfitted seat covers of textile; wall hangings of textile; curtains; table cloths not of paper; draperies namely, thick drop curtains; fabric divider, namely, Japanese noren; covers for telephone of textile or woven textile; covers for doorknob of textile or woven textile; tablemats, not of paper | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2015 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |