USPTO serial 79150680
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Aperitifs; arrack arak; baijiu Chinese distilled alcoholic beverage; brandy; wine; piquette; whisky; vodka; anisette liqueur; kirsch; gin; digesters liqueurs and spirits; cocktails; curacao; anise liqueur; liqueurs; alcoholic beverages, except beer; pre-mixed alcoholic beverages, other than beer-based; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; distilled beverages; spirits beverages; mead hydromel; peppermint liqueurs; bitters; rum; sake; perry; cider; rice alcohol; alcoholic extracts; fruit extracts, alcoholic; alcoholic essences; nira sugarcane-based alcoholic beverage | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 27, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |