USPTO serial 79150885
LEFAST SHOPPING BY COMPTOIR DES COTONNIERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEFAST SHOPPING BY COMPTOIR DES COTONNIERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sylvia A. Petrosky
Sylvia A. Petrosky Sylvia A. Petrosky, Attorney at Law2273 Smith RoadAkron, OH 44333UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, jackets; footwear; headwear; anoraks; aprons; Ascots; swimsuits; belts for clothing; blazers; bodices; blousons; singlets; boleros; boots; brassieres; briefs; camisoles; pelerines; caps headwear; cardigans; teddies; wooden shoes; fur coats; suit jackets; overcoats; breeches for wear; dresses; garter belts; girdles; nightgowns; hats; headbands; hosiery; jackets; jeans; sweaters; slips; neckerchiefs; kimonos; tights; mittens; moccasins; collar protectors; neckties; bib overalls; pajamas; trousers; panty hose; parkas; pedal pushers; dressing gowns; ponchos; pullovers; raincoats; sandals; sashes for wear; shawls; shirts; shorts; undershirts; shoes; sports shorts; skirts; ski suits; socks; sports coats; sports shirts; stockings; stoles; suits; suspenders; tee-shirts; tuxedos; underpants; vests; tailleurs; coats; pelisses; tracksuits; gloves clothing | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions; dissemination of advertising material in the nature of leaflets, prospectuses, printed matter, and samples, arranging of newspaper subscriptions for others; arranging of telecommunication service subscriptions for others; providing television home shopping services in the field of general consumer merchandise; business management and organization consultancy; accounting; document reproduction; employment agencies; computerized file management; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; online advertising on a computer network; rental of advertising time on all communication media; publication of advertising texts; rental of advertising space; dissemination of advertisements; public relations; retail store services for clothing, leather goods and umbrellas, footwear, optical goods, jewelry and timepieces, perfumery items, stationery items, household linen, fabrics; retail store services provided by digital pop-up retail stores for clothing, leather goods and umbrellas, footwear, optical goods, jewelry and timepieces, perfumery items, stationery items, household linen, fabrics | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 22, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |