USPTO serial 79150909
PAIRRETO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4797227Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 25, 2015
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAIRRETO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LS Houten, NL
LS Houten, NL
LS Houten, NL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | laundry sorters for Household use in the nature of a device for holding sock pairs in washing machines and dryers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 14, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |