USPTO serial 79150996
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages (except beer); alcoholic extracts; alcoholic essences; alcoholic beverages (except beer); alcoholic beverages containing fruit; anisette liqueur; aperitifs; arak arrack; brandy; wine; kirsch; vodka; bitters; distilled beverages; gin; digesters liqueurs and spirits; cocktails; perry; curacao; liqueurs; mead hydromel; peppermint liqueurs; nira sugarcane-based alcoholic beverage; rice alcohol; piquette; alcoholic fruit extracts; pre-mixed alcoholic beverages, other than beer-based; rum; cider; sake; spirits beverages; whisky | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 5, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |