Drawing for OG BY LES EOLIERS

USPTO serial 79151302

OG BY LES EOLIERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OG BY LES EOLIERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John J. O'Malley

JOHN J. O'MALLEY VOLPE AND KOENIG, P.C.30 S 17TH ST STE 1800PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 15, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 12, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 22, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 20, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 20, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 20, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 3, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 3, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 23, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 23, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Apr 1, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 1, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 1, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 25, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Mar 25, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 25, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 16, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 9, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 8, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 5, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 29, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 29, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 28, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance