Drawing for PULLREVIEW

USPTO serial 79151303

PULLREVIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4737196Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 19, 2015
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PULLREVIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina M. Licursi

Christina M. Licursi Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for reviewing and processing software and their code source, detecting bugs and vulnerabilities, supporting code review, supporting reviewers' interaction and communication, and assessing software quality; Computer programs for reviewing and processing software and their code source, detecting bugs and vulnerabilities, supporting code review, supporting reviewers' interaction and communication, and assessing software quality; Downloadable electronic publications, namely, web pages and e-books featuring code reviews, refactoring, and development practices; Downloadable image files containing statistics and other visualizations of code reviews, refactoring, and development practicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
038Providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer usersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Software as a service SaaS featuring software for reviewing and processing software and their code source, detecting bugs and vulnerabilities, supporting code review, supporting reviewers' interaction and communication, and assessing software quality; Quality control services, namely, quality control for others; Conversion of computer program data and data, not being physical conversionSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 20, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 31, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 22, 2022XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Sep 22, 2022XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Aug 3, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 3, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 19, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 17, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 15, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 15, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 20, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Aug 19, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 19, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 3, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 3, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 11, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 11, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 11, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 23, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 12, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 18, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 18, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 17, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 10, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 10, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 16, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 16, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 14, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 2, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 29, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 28, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance