USPTO serial 79151356
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TENGZHOU TRI-UNION MACHINERY CO., LTD.
Tengzhou, Shandong, CN
Other trademarks owned by TENGZHOU TRI-UNION MACHINERY CO., LTD.
TENGZHOU TRI-UNION MACHINERY; CO., LTD.
Tengzhou, Shandong, CN
Other trademarks owned by TENGZHOU TRI-UNION MACHINERY; CO., LTD.
TENGZHOU TRI-UNION MACHINERY; CO., LTD.
Tengzhou, Shandong, CN
Other trademarks owned by TENGZHOU TRI-UNION MACHINERY; CO., LTD.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Wood processing machines, namely, electric wood saw machines, polishing machines for use in grinding and polishing wood, sanding machines, saw-tooth setting machines, wood beating machines, wood chipping machines, wood drilling machines, wood milling machines, wood planning machines, wood sawing machines; rolling machines, namely, roller conveyors, rolling machines for rolling metal, rolling mills; drilling machines, namely, trepanning machines; mechanical meat processing machines, namely, meat mincers; engraving machines; punching machines, namely, punching presses; milling machines; lathes; drilling machines; non manual hand-held tools, namely, electric drills, electric hammers, grinders, pneumatic drills, pneumatic hammers, power-operated hand-held crimpers; hydraulic press machines; cutting machines; machine tools, namely, broaches, chasers, gear cutters, metalworking machine tools, milling cutters, taps, thread milling cutters; boring machines; band saws; electric polishing machines and equipment, namely, electric floor polishing machines and apparatus, electric wax-polishing machines for household and industrial purposes, and grinding and polishing machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 29, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 8, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |