Drawing for EUFORIE

USPTO serial 79151590

EUFORIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EUFORIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Rice, flour; flour-milling products; bread pastry and confectionery; oat based food; farinaceous food; cereal bars and energy bars; biscuits; buns; caramels; waffles; crackers; pancakes; ferments for pastes; chips; pies; maize processed; halvah; dough; marzipan; rusks; unleavened bread; breadcrumbs; sandwiches; almond paste; soya bean paste; cake dough; pasta; fresh pasta; pasta containing stuffings; dried pasta; pizza; preparations made from cereals; cereal-based snack food; rice-based snack foodSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 5, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 7, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 7, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 26, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 10, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 10, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 21, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 7, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 26, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 25, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 9, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 8, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 7, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 6, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 5, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 4, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance