USPTO serial 79151717
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
EE-11415 Tallinn, EE
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Electronic games, including electronic games for teaching children, portable games with liquid crystal displays, portable electronic games consoles for use with an external display screen or monitor | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education; providing of training; entertainment; electronic games, including computer games provided online or via global computer networks (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations); providing on-line electronic publications, not downloadable; education information | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 13, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |