Drawing for EISENBEISS SETTING STANDARDS IN GEARING TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79151979

EISENBEISS SETTING STANDARDS IN GEARING TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4750139Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 9, 2015
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EISENBEISS SETTING STANDARDS IN GEARING TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen M. Dorvee

Stephen M. Dorvee Arnall Golden Gregory LLP171 17th Street NW, Suite 2100Atlanta, GA 30363-1031UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, namely, gears other than for land vehicles, and machine tools, namely, gears and enclosed drives for industrial machinery, motors and engine other than for land vehicles; gear boxes other than for land vehicles, hydraulic and pneumatical drives for machines and machine tools; gear wheels specially adapted for use with motors and engines other than for land vehicles, couplings for machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
012Gear boxes for land vehicles; Shaft couplings for land vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
037Maintenance and repair of machines, gear boxes, drives and couplingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Technical design, planning and engineering of machines, gears, drives and couplingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Sep 22, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 17, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 30, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 30, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 9, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 9, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 24, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 9, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 24, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 24, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 18, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 4, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Feb 18, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 10, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 10, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 5, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 28, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 10, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 23, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 23, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 23, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 23, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 22, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 12, 2014LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 11, 2014SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance