Drawing for PEAK PERFORMER GC

USPTO serial 79152196

PEAK PERFORMER GC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4815244Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 22, 2015
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEAK PERFORMER GC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue10th FloorNew York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Metal processing machines, namely, for decoiling, coiling, conveying, feeding, leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting and stacking of metal strips and of workpieces made from metal strips; hydraulic and pneumatic control mechanisms for machines; belt conveyors; metal strip coilers, namely, machines for reeling metal strip; cutting-off machines, namely, metal strip shearing machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
009Electronic drive and machine controls, namely, electronic controls for machine drives; software for controlling and regulating metal processing machines and metal processing systemsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
037Repair and maintenance of metal working machines and toolsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
040Machining of metal; processing of metal surfaces, namely, treatment of materialsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Technical project engineering and technical consultancy related to metal processing, namely, consulting in the field of testing and evaluation of metal materials; planning of metal processing systems, namely, engineering in the field of metal processing; designing and programming of software for controlling and regulating metal processing machines and systems; engineering; technological services in the field of manufacturing, namely, information technology consulting in the field of manufacturingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 29, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 27, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 1, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 1, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Dec 8, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 8, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 22, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 17, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 21, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 21, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 22, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 22, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 17, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Sep 11, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 11, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 7, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 7, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 24, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 18, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 17, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 30, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 26, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 26, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 26, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 26, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 26, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 18, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 12, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Apr 28, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 27, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 9, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 2, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 2, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 2, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 2, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 2, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 27, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 27, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2014CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Dec 12, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 24, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 3, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 3, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 3, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 2, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 26, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 26, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 18, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance