Drawing for INUS

USPTO serial 79152374

INUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4815248Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 22, 2015
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water purifiers for household purposes; toilet bowls; bidets; pipes for toilets and urinal receptacles being parts of sanitary facilities; toilet seats; toilet stool units with a washing water squirter; urinals being sanitary fixtures; bath tubs; prefabricated bathrooms in the nature of shower surrounds, toilets, and bathroom sinks, all sold as a unit; shower enclosures; showers; wash-hand basins being parts of sanitary installations; washstands being parts of sanitary installations; flushing tanks; water taps in the nature of faucets; hand drying apparatus for washrooms in the nature of electric hot air hand dryersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 27, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 1, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 8, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 8, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 31, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 17, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 22, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 11, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 7, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 1, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 29, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 21, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
May 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 21, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 8, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 31, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 10, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 9, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 30, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance