USPTO serial 79152407
SPEEDICHANNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPEEDICHANNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clifford D. Hyra
CLIFFORD D HYRA SYMBUS LAW GROUP LLC11710 PLAZA AMERICA DRSTE 2000RESTON, VA 20190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Building materials, namely, plastic pipe supports, pre-cast concrete wall forms, non-metallic covers for ducts, tubes and polymeric duct assemblies, composite panels composed primarily of nonmetal materials, railings, not of metal, non-metal bonding fasteners for mounting and demounting ducts, cables and pipes; rigid pipes, not of metal for building; ducts and other casings for cables, not of metal; fittings not of metal, non-electric for ducts | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | Non-metallic fasteners for cables; hinges, not of metal for fixing cables or tubes; plastic fittings for the attachment of cables or pipes clips; structural fasteners, not of metal, namely, non-metal threaded fasteners, plastic fasteners for ducts and couplings for organizing and holding fiber optic and similar cable and wiring, Plastic fasteners for holding ducts and pipes in place | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |