USPTO serial 79152688
CADENZZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4805951Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 8, 2015
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CADENZZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa W. Rosaya
452 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Goods in precious metals or coated therewith, namely, genuine and costume jewelry; jewelry ornaments; necklaces; rings being jewelry; brooches; bangles; pendants; jewelry chains of precious metals; lockets; small items of jewelry of glass, natural or artificial precious stones, plastic, common and precious metal for personal use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of jewellery; retail store services via the Internet in the field of jewellery; organisation of fairs and exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; sponsoring in the form of advertising, namely, promotion of products and services of others through sponsoring arrangements related to entertainment, sporting and cultural events; business management, consultancy in the establishment and operation of retail stores and providing advice in the running of establishments as franchises | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CADENZZA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2014 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |