Drawing for ECOBRICO

USPTO serial 79152831

ECOBRICO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JOHNSON, DONALD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOBRICO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004fuels and lighting fuel, namely charcoal briquettesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 21, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 21, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 7, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 20, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 20, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 20, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 17, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 17, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 4, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 24, 2016EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Mar 25, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 11, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Mar 11, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Mar 11, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Mar 9, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 9, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 16, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 7, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 7, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jan 5, 2016RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED
Jan 5, 2016RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED
Jan 5, 2016RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED
Dec 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 19, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 18, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 4, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jul 16, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 16, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 29, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
Jun 29, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 29, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 29, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jun 16, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 16, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 18, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 18, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 15, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 14, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 10, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 9, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance