USPTO serial 79153039
LYSEDIA LIFTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4861443Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 1, 2015
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LYSEDIA LIFTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Septèmes les Vallons, FR
Septèmes les Vallons, FR
Septèmes les Vallons, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Robinson
James R. Robinson Robinson Law Office, PLLC13 Loyola DriveHot Springs Village, AR 71909UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ Bleaching preparations for laundry use and other substances for laundry use, namely, bluing for laundry, laundry detergent; cleaning preparations, polishing preparations, and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumes, essential oils, ] Cosmetics [, hair lotions; dentifrices; depilatories; make-up removing products, namely, make-up remover, make-up removing milks; lipstick; beauty masks; shaving products, namely, shaving gel, shaving lotions, shaving soap; preservatives for leather, namely, leather preserving polishes, preservative creams for leather; creams for leather ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Théodore Pierre Laboratoires
- Other trademarks owned by Théodore Pierre Laboratoires
- Other trademarks owned by Théodore Pierre Laboratoires
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named LYSEDIA LIFTAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2022 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 24, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |