USPTO serial 79153076
STAR BURST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4741390Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 26, 2015
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with STAR BURST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Gurfinkel
Daniel M. Gurfinkel Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC230 W. Monroe St.Suite 2100Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Metalworking machines and metal working machine tools; chemical processing machines and apparatus, namely, pulverization, dispersion, and emulsification machine; food and beverage processing machines and apparatus, namely, pumps, electric food processors, beverage processing machines including residential beverage filter and dispensers, and coffee dispensers; aerated beverage making machines; and beverage pumps for the beverage industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 26, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |