USPTO serial 79153139
SPARX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPARX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HLEKS GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Anadoluhisari Beykoz-Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by HLEKS GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aylin Demirci
Aylin Demirci Carr & Ferrell LLP120 Constitution DriveMenlo Park, CA 94025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, cocoa, coffee substitutes, coffee or cocoa based beverages, chocolate based beverages, macaroni, meat pasties, processed semolina, pastry; bakery products, chocolate desserts, namely dessert puddings, dessert soufflés, dessert mousse, bakery desserts, prepared desserts (confectionery), made of sugar; honey, royal jelly for food purposes, propolis (bee glue) for human consumption, condiments for foodstuff, namely, chutneys, dried fig-based condiments, savory sauces; yeasts, baking powder, all kinds of flour, corn starch, crystal sugar, cube sugar, powdered sugar, tea, iced tea, confectionery, namely, pastilles, lollipops, candy , popping candy, and carbonated candy; biscuits, crackers, waffles, pies, cakes, caramel filled chocolates and confectionery, namely, fondants, chewing gums, ice creams, frozen creams, namely, frozen custard; processed cereal; none of the aforementioned is sugar free or is made of sugar substitute, sweetener, or xylitol | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |