Drawing for EYEWAIR

USPTO serial 79153182

EYEWAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EYEWAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart L Gitler

Stewart L Gitler WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC2000 Duke StreetSuite 100Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectacles, spectacle frames, sunglasses, sports glasses, spectacle lenses, contact lenses, parts and accessories for spectacles, namely replacement lenses, spectacle frames, spectacle temples, clips, nose pieces, spectacle chains and spectacle cases; optical apparatus and equipment for manufacturing and processing spectacles, spectacle frames and spectacle lensesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
035Retail store, wholesale store , online retail and wholesale store, and mail order services, including via the Internet, in relation to spectacles, spectacle parts and spectacle accessoriesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
045Licensing of industrial property rights and copyright; issuing licences for franchising concepts, namely licensing of franchising concepts in the filed of spectacles, spectacle parts and spectacle accessoriesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 21, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 20, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 4, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 4, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 25, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 9, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 9, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 19, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 4, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 4, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 15, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
May 15, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 24, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 24, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 19, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 19, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 18, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 17, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 18, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 14, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 9, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance