USPTO serial 79153256
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. LaBarge
Richard M. LaBarge Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 6300Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Machines, namely, apparatus for urea, ammonia, methanol, melamine, nitric acid, ammonium nitrate, phosphate, and complex fertilizers synthesis in the nature of blending machines for chemical processing, disintegrators for chemical processing, dissolving machines, dust collecting machines for chemical processing, emulsifying machines for chemical processing, extracting machines, filtering machines for chemical processing, grinding mills for chemical processing, industrial mixer for mixing liquids, kneading machines, and presses for chemical processing; machines, namely, mechanical spreaders for seed and dry lawn chemicals, granulating machines, and industrial chemical reactors ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [ Laboratory chemical reactors; reactors, coils, retorts, and crackers for use in high temperature chemical reactions ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | [ Heat exchangers; condensers and distillation columns for separation of liquids and/or steam, not for scientific purposes and other than parts of machines ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design of chemical plants and installations; design of monitoring systems for chemical plants and installations; development of software for control of chemical processes; technical assistance in the nature of chemical engineering and consulting concerning chemical processes and the design of chemical factories and installations; drafting of plans for the construction of chemical plants and installations; engineering consulting for commissioning of chemical factories and installations | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 18, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 23, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 19, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |