USPTO serial 79153356
LEVERAXE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEVERAXE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Axes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 7, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |