Drawing for ARCO

USPTO serial 79153474

ARCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony King

ANTHONY KING WPA PC2301 DUPONT DRSUITE 510IRVINE, CA 92612

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Antifreeze; hydraulic fluid; brake fluid; chemical additives for fuel; detergent additives for fuels; power steering fluid; transmission fluid; coolants for vehicle engines; chemical additives for motor fuelsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
004Industrial oils; industrial greases; cutting fluids; combustible oil; fuel oil; lubricating oils; motor oil; lubricating greases; benzene fuel; fuel gas; fuel oil; gasoline; lighting fuel; motor fuelSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Auto body repair services; automobile cleaning; automobile greasing; automobile lubrication; automobile repair and maintenance; garage services for repair of automobiles; fueling services for aircraft; refueling and lubrication services for vehicles and equipmentSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 6, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 20, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 4, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 31, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 31, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 26, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 16, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 16, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 16, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 25, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 24, 2016PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Mar 16, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2016PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 4, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 16, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 5, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 21, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 31, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 9, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 2, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jun 19, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 26, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 26, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 15, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 28, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 25, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 22, 2014RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Oct 22, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2014LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance