USPTO serial 79153541
CROMWELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CROMWELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely, wealth management services; advisory services relating to financial investment; fund management, namely management of real property funds; financial risk management services; administration of financial affairs, namely financial trust administration; business appraisals for financial valuation; financial consultancy services relating to property development, and property management; real estate services, namely rental property management services; financial valuation of personal property and real estate; real estate investment services, financing of real property development; financial management of real property portfolios | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |