USPTO serial 79153556
CELLULOSCRUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4910709Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 8, 2016
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELLULOSCRUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Products made from natural fibers derived from cellulose, starch or other polysaccharides, namely, additives for the production of cosmetic products or sanitary products for exfoliation or cleansing purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 23, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 2, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |