USPTO serial 79153668
ELEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTELL, BRITTANY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Cost analyses; market analysis, market research; public opinion research; expert advice on matters of economic activities; dissemination of advertising; recruitment services; bookkeeping and accounting services; preparation of financial statements; preparation of tax declaration; business administration relating to authentication of companies; services of searching for business partners; advertising; customer marketing support services; HR administration; purchase auctioneering services and procurement; request for proposal (RFP) services; online store services; compilation of data into computer databases; systemization of data into computer databases | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Banking; banking services with direct access via the Internet; financial consulting; financial services; debt collection services; banking information; debit cards and credit cards services; fund investments; loans; financial operations; foreign exchange operations; financial intermediation; financial transactions; electronic funds transfer; handling of electronic commercial transactions; insurance brokerage | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Hosting of the computer (network) web sites; updating of computer software; computer systems analysis; installation of computer software; hosting of databases accessible via the Internet; designing of computer software; creating and maintaining web sites for third parties; creating and maintaining websites for others | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |