USPTO serial 79153677
BÄCKEREI EBERL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BÄCKEREI EBERL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Joseph Trojan
R. Joseph Trojan Trojan Law Offices9250 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 325BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Bread and bread products, namely, rye bread, wheat bread, whole grain bread, farmhouse bread, bread for toasting, bread flavoured with spices, brown bread, flat bread, rolls and pretzels, bread for making dumplings, breadcrumbs, bread doughs; pastry, namely, cakes, cookies, tarts, pies; confectionery, namely, chocolate, fondants, chocolate candies | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorships, retail store services, and online retail store services featuring bread and bread products, namely, rye bread, wheat bread, whole grain bread, farmhouse bread, bread for toasting, bread flavoured with spices, brown bread, flat bread, rolls and pretzels, bread for making dumplings, breadcrumbs, bread doughs, pastry, namely, cakes, cookies, tarts, pies, confectionery, namely, chocolate, fondants, chocolate candies | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |