USPTO serial 79153750
VIRTUAL FORGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4943517Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 26, 2016
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with VIRTUAL FORGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Avsec
Andrew J. Avsec Crowell & Moring LLPP. O. BOX 10395Chicago, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for automatic application security and quality testing, for implementation of corrective actions and preventive measures, and to obtain the steady control of risks in computer software from inside out and outside in; software systems for automatic application security and quality testing, for implementation of corrective actions and preventive measures, and to obtain the steady control of risks in computer software from inside out and outside in; computer programs for automatic application security and quality testing, for implementation of corrective actions and preventive measures, and to obtain the steady control of risks in computer software from inside out and outside in; computer software for computer aided software engineering; computer programmes for data processing; computer operating programs for automatic application security and quality testing, for implementation of corrective actions and preventive measures, and to obtain the steady control of risks in computer software from inside out and outside in | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing of training, in particular electronic data processing (EDP) and informational technology (IT) courses; providing of training in the field of the development of computer software, software systems and programming languages; providing of training in relation to the use and operation of computer software, software systems and programming languages; training with regard to software and hardware architecture; training with regard to the programming and configuration of computer software, software systems and programming languages | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development, programming and implementation of computer software, software systems and programming languages; technical consulting in relation to hardware, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware problems; technical consultation, namely, technical support and design and development services in relation to computer software and software systems; security consulting in relation to hardware, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware problems; security consultation, namely, technical support and design and development services in relation to computer software and software system; quality consultancy, namely, quality control of others relating to computer hardware, software, and software systems; consultancy services relating to computer networks using mixed software environments; installation, duplication and updating of computer software and software systems; maintenance of computer software and software systems; computer system analysis, in particular security in the field of applications; computer systems design; rental, hiring and leasing of computer software and software systems; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for application security and quality testing in computer software systems and applications; scientific and technological services in the field of computer security, namely, computer forensic services, industrial analysis, computer network penetration testing, quality testing, implementation of corrective actions and preventive measures with respect to computer software system weaknesses, and scientific research and product design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services in the field of software security and software quality; consultancy and information in relation to the aforesaid services, included in this class; computer security and optimization consultancy with regard to software and hardware architecture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Virtual Forge GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Virtual Forge GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Virtual Forge GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VIRTUAL FORGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 24, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2022 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2022 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2022 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2021 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2016 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |