USPTO serial 79153809
FIOREGLUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIOREGLUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Rice; meal; farinaceous foods; cereal preparations; dough, batter and mixes therefor; yeast and raising agents; thickening agents for cooking foodstuffs; starch for food; bread; bakery goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Malt and cereals, unprocessed; maize | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |