Drawing for VIP

USPTO serial 79154000

VIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas J. Gingo

Nicholas J. Gingo Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP1621 Euclid Ave.19th FloorCleveland, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Microphones; microphone grids; microphone nose cones; microphone windscreens; microphone holders; microphone stands; microphone cables; microphone connectors and microphone adapters; microphone booms; microphone amplifiers; microphone power supplies and microphone calibratorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 27, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 4, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 22, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 16, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2014CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 15, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 21, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 6, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 5, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance