Drawing for FLIXBUS

USPTO serial 79154297

FLIXBUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLIXBUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicles; apparatus for locomotion by land, air or waterSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Advertising; business management; business administration; office functionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
039Transport; packaging and storage of goods; travel arrangementSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 25, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2022CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 19, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 6, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 26, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 8, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 7, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 7, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 30, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 9, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 8, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance