Drawing for CHEVALIER TORPEZ

USPTO serial 79154416

CHEVALIER TORPEZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEVALIER TORPEZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages (except beers); ciders; digesters (liqueurs and spirits); wines; spiritsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2026CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 12, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2026CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 21, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 13, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 22, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 25, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 6, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 23, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 20, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance