Drawing for C-TECH

USPTO serial 79154426

C-TECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4806029Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 8, 2015
Examiner
MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with C-TECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Judith L. Grubner

Judith L. Grubner Arnstein & Lehr LLP120 S. Riverside Plaza, Ste. 1200Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Dental apparatus, namely, drills; dental apparatus, namely, electric drills; pins for artificial teeth; dentures; artificial teeth; artificial jaws; surgical implants made of artificial materials, namely, dental implants; dental instruments, namely, crown and bridge removers, dental foundation supports, dental fixtures, dental prostheses; dental burrsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 18, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 20, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 14, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 25, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 12, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 9, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 8, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 23, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 19, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 24, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 24, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance