Drawing for KONSTAR

USPTO serial 79154529

KONSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4934472Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 12, 2016
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KONSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sergei Orel

Sergei Orel Law Office of Sergei Orel, LLC7000 Boulevard East, Suite 43-CGuttenberg, NJ 07093UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007electric egg beaters; electric food blenders for household purposes; gas-operated blow torches; bread cutting machines; butter machines; cartridges for milk filtering machines; cleaning appliances utilizing steam; coffee grinders, other than hand-operated; cream and milk separators, namely, machines for filtering cream and milk; electric food crushers for kitchen use; food cutting machines for kitchen use; dishwashers; milk filtering machines; flour milling machines; food processors, electric; electromechanical food preparation machines, namely, tumblers for marinating food; fruit presses, electric, for household purposes; grating machines for vegetables; grinding machines for vegetables; electric ice crushing machines; rammers machines; electric mixers; electric coffee grinders, electric food grinders, electric meat grinders; knives, electric; electric meat choppers; electric meat mincers; electric mixers for household purposes; electric standing mixers; machines for making pasta; pepper mills other than hand-operated; scissors, electric; sharpening machines; sifting machines; food peeling machines; tin openers, electric; can openers, electric; wine presses being machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 20, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 28, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 28, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 28, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 12, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 12, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 26, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 14, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2015DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jun 23, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 11, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 29, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 25, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 25, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 22, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance