USPTO serial 79154614
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT S. BRODER
ROBERT S. BRODER COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Motor driven tools as parts of horticultural and agricultural machines, namely, cultivators, mowers, mulchers and parts therefore; machines for forestry and municipal services, namely, cultivators, harvesters, disk harrows, seeders for fruit growing and wine production, lawn sweepers, snow blowers, snowplows, weed removal machines for removal of weeds through the application of hot water, watering machines for the watering of plants and vegetables and lawns, water sprayers for the cleaning of streets and sidewalks, artificial turf cleaners, weed cutters, machines for the removal of dog excrement and parts therefore; agricultural machines, namely, cultivators, harvesters, disk harrows and seeders used for spraying, sprinkling and dusting of fruit and wine vineyards and parts therefore; scattering machines for scattering of salt and gravel and parts therefore; motor driven tools as parts of machines for firefighting, cleaning and decontaminating objects of all kinds, namely, pumps as parts of machines which feature a spraying device, a fluid or treatment agent storage container made of metal or plastic, a dispensing device and/or a heating device and parts therefore; pumps as parts of machines, namely, horticultural and agricultural machines and parts therefore; machines for forestry and municipal services, namely, agricultural machines, namely, tree cutters, foliage cutters, machines for bundling of cut foliage, defoliators, vine and wood choppers, irrigation systems for growing of fruit and wine production and parts therefore | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Haulage vehicles, namely, tractors for use in horticultural, agriculture, forestry and by municipal services as well as in fruit growing and wine production and parts therefore | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |