Drawing for BEE FAMOUS

USPTO serial 79154659

BEE FAMOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEE FAMOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages (except beers), ciders, digesters (liqueurs and spirits), wines, spirits, alcoholic extracts or essencesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 8, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 6, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 13, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 11, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 19, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 30, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 29, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance