Drawing for WILD FLOWERS

USPTO serial 79154846

WILD FLOWERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILD FLOWERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith not included in other classes; jewellery and imitation jewellery, gemstones; precious stones; semi-precious stones; diamonds; watches, clocks; horological and chronometric instruments; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 30, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 22, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 8, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 19, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 11, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 20, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 19, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2014SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance