USPTO serial 79155435
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Fotostudio Jan Bartelsman, Besloten Vennootschap
Wevershoof, NL
Other trademarks owned by Fotostudio Jan Bartelsman, Besloten Vennootschap
Fotostudio Jan Bartelsman, Besloten Vennootschap
Wevershoof, NL
Other trademarks owned by Fotostudio Jan Bartelsman, Besloten Vennootschap
Fotostudio Jan Bartelsman, Besloten Vennootschap
Wevershoof, NL
Other trademarks owned by Fotostudio Jan Bartelsman, Besloten Vennootschap
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable electronic publications, in the nature of e-zines featuring dining and restaurant information; computer application software for providing pictures and information about restaurants | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 27, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 3, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |