Drawing for HEWOLF

USPTO serial 79155764

HEWOLF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEWOLF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing; layettes clothing; swimsuits; waterproof clothing; shoes; hats; hosiery; gloves clothing; scarfs; girdlesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 30, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 5, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 18, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 27, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 27, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 17, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 18, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 17, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 2, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance