Drawing for HEWOLF

USPTO serial 79155764

HEWOLF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEWOLF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing; layettes clothing; swimsuits; waterproof clothing; shoes; hats; hosiery; gloves clothing; scarfs; girdlesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 30, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 17, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 29, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 25, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Aug 5, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 18, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 17, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 27, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 27, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 17, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 17, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 19, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 19, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 18, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 17, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 6, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Dec 2, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 27, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance