USPTO serial 79155853
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
RUEIL MALMAISON, FR
RUEIL MALMAISON, FR
RUEIL MALMAISON, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven A. Abreu
Steven A. Abreu Sunstein LLP100 High StreetBoston, MA 02110UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Liquid or semi-liquid construction materials for injection into the ground, namely, calcite, calcite liquid solution, limestone cement and cement containing bacterium; construction materials, not of metal, for injection into the ground for strengthening or reinforcing purposes, namely, calcite, calcite liquid solution, limestone cement and cement containing bacterium; construction materials, not of metal, for ground reinforcement, namely calcite, calcite liquid solution, limestone cement and cement containing bacterium | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Construction, namely, building construction; injection of products into the ground, particularly for strengthening or reinforcing purposes, namely, soil strengthening services; construction consultation | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Engineering; engineering consulting; engineering consultation in the field of civil engineering related to the injections of calcite, calcite liquid solution, limestone cement and cement containing bacterium for reinforcement and strengthening of soil | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 4, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2015 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2014 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 6, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |