USPTO serial 79155927
GRAVIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4883475Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 12, 2016
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRAVIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather E. Balmat
Heather E. Balmat Balmat Law, PLLC977 Seminole Trail, #342Charlottesville, VA 22901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | playthings, namely, remote control flying toys with motors, namely, airplanes, helicopters and quadrocopters, and structural parts therefore | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 12, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 5, 2022 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2022 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 14, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |