USPTO serial 79156065
Serial No. 79156065
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79156065?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suzanne K. Ketler
Suzanne K. Ketler Roetzel & Andress222 S. Main St.Akron, OH 44308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Health food supplements; dietary, herbal and nutritional supplements; dietary, herbal and nutritional preparations and substances, namely, pills and powder preparations all for sports and performance enhancement, endurance sports, muscle building purposes, weight management, weight loss and weight gain; vitamins and mineral supplements; food and dietary supplements, namely, anti-oxidants; meal replacement energy bars; food and dietary supplement for sports and performance enhancement; food and dietary supplements for weight gain and weight loss; weight loss, thermogenic fat burning supplements in the nature of nutritional and dietary supplements in tablet and capsule form for sports and performance enhancement, endurance sports, muscle building purposes, weight management, weight loss and weight gain; vitamin formulas in tablet and capsule form, namely, dietary supplements for sports and performance enhancement, endurance sports, muscle building purposes, weight management, weight loss and weight gain; dietary supplements, namely, dietary preparations for slimming and weight gain purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |