Drawing for OILL EXTRACTED UNDER COPENHAGEN

USPTO serial 79156150

OILL EXTRACTED UNDER COPENHAGEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OILL EXTRACTED UNDER COPENHAGEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and their alloys; jewellery; precious stones; horological and chronometric instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
018Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes, namely, casual bags, handbags, purses and wallets; animal skins, hides; trunks and travelling bags; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, footwear, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 7, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 5, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 31, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 30, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance