Drawing for MANILLE

USPTO serial 79156202

MANILLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4797376Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 25, 2015
Examiner
MCPHERSON RAYBURN, SHAVELL A
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MANILLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian Beverly

Brian Beverly Beeson Skinner Beverly, LLPOne Kaiser Plaza, Suite 750Oakland, CA 94612United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033[ Wine, ] spirits and liquorACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2026INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 8, 2026INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 5, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 5, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 5, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 5, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 20, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 13, 2021NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 13, 2021C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 13, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 10, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2016FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 25, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 9, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 15, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 12, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 12, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 11, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance