USPTO serial 79156347
MFLASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4834121Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 20, 2015
- Examiner
- DUONG, SUI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MFLASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Reidl
Paul W. Reidl Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty1500 First Street, Ste 200Napa, CA 94559UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunication apparatus and instruments, namely, telecommunication switches, telecommunication exchangers, telecommunication towers, and telecommunication transmitters; electronic telephone cards, namely, pre-paid telephone calling cards, magnetically encoded; electronic credit cards, namely, magnetically encoded credit cards; memory cards; integrated circuit cards; magnetic identifying cards; prepayment cards in the nature of pre-paid magnetically encoded telephone calling cards; chip-based cards in the nature of encoded electronic chip cards for mobile telephones; blank electronic chip cards; telephone answering machines; portable telephones; telephones apparatus; computer telephony software; downloadable computer software applications for mobile telephones that function to place voice calls; software for enabling connection to databases and the Internet and telecommunication switches which enable the user to be interconnected to the public switched telephone network; software for enabling connection to databases and the Internet | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Telephone calling cards, not magnetically encoded; telephone tickets of paper, namely pre-paid telephone calling cards, not magnetically encoded; correspondence cards, printed tickets | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications, namely, national and international communications by telephones, mobile telephones, teleconferencing and video conferencing; voice, video and multimedia messaging services and electronic mail services; transmission of messages, including short message services; provision of Internet access to a file sharing portal and to telecommunication services for file transfer and sharing | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BeeOne Communications SA (BeeOne Communiations AG) (BeeOne Communications Ltd)
- Other trademarks owned by BeeOne Communications SA (BeeOne Communiations AG) (BeeOne Communications Ltd)
- Other trademarks owned by BeeOne Communications SA (BeeOne Communiations AG) (BeeOne Communications Ltd)
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named MFLASH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | IRIV | IRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 4, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 25, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |