USPTO serial 79156444
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Lacquers in the nature of polymeric coating which protects against corrosion and harsh working environments; rust preservatives in the nature of a coating which protects against corrosion and harsh working environments; colorants and mordant dyes in the nature of powder coatings which protect against corrosion and harsh working environments; none of the aforesaid goods being for dental purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of metals, namely, nanotechnology and e-coating-based treatment of metals against corrosion and harsh working environments | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 16, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |