Drawing for ZAGHLOUL

USPTO serial 79156640

ZAGHLOUL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5051644Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 4, 2016
Examiner
BAGLINI, KAREN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZAGHLOUL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer M. Hetu

Jennifer M. Hetu Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP39400 Woodward AvenueSuite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034Tobacco whether manufactured or unmanufactured; smoking tobacco; pipe tobacco; hand rolling tobacco; chewing tobacco; cigarettes; cigarillos; tobacco substitutes sold separately or blended with tobacco, none being for medicinal or curative purpose; snuff; smokers' articles included in this class, namely, ashtrays for smokers, hookah charcoal, lighters for smokers, and hookah pipes, cigarette papers, cigarette tubes and matchesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 29, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 8, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 21, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 21, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 10, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 4, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2017FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 4, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 19, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 15, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 31, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 15, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 15, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 22, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 19, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 18, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance