Drawing for KALINKA

USPTO serial 79156809

KALINKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KALINKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Aperitifs; arrack arak; brandy; wine; whisky; vodka; anisette liqueur; kirsch; gin; digesters liqueurs and spirits; cocktails; curacao; anise liqueur; liqueurs; alcoholic beverages, except beer; pre-mixed alcoholic beverages, other than beer-based; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; spirits beverages; distilled beverages; mead hydromel; peppermint liqueurs; bitters; rum; sake; perry; cider; rice alcohol; alcoholic extracts; fruit extracts, alcoholic; alcoholic essencesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 9, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 21, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 23, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 22, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 21, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 16, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance