Drawing for AMALLOY

USPTO serial 79156908

AMALLOY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMALLOY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Aluminium; bronze; anti-friction metal; beryllium glucinium; copper, unwrought or semi-wrought; brass, unwrought or semi-wrought; ingots of common metal; common metals, unwrought or semi-wrought; alloys of common metal; metals in powder form; sleeves metal hardware; wire of common metal alloys, except fuse wire; ironmongerySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 25, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 18, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 15, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 26, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 24, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 24, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 24, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance